Tag Archives: anaerobic digestion

1074-1096 M. González-Palacio, L. González-Palacio, S. Villegas-Moncada, C. Arrieta-González, M. Luna-delRisco and C. Arroyave-Quiceno
Enhancing biogas production predictions using ARIMAX models on mixed silages
Abstract |
Full text PDF (2 MB)

Enhancing biogas production predictions using ARIMAX models on mixed silages

M. González-Palacio¹*, L. González-Palacio², S. Villegas-Moncada³, C. Arrieta-González³, M. Luna-delRisco³ and C. Arroyave-Quiceno⁴

¹Universidad de Medellín, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Information Technology, Carrera 84 # 30-65, CO 050026 Medellín, Colombia
²Universidad EAFIT, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Product Design and Experience, Calle 49 # 7 Sur-50, CO 050022 Medellín, Colombia
³Universidad de Medellín, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Energy,
Carrera 84 # 30-65, 050026 Medellín, Colombia
⁴Universidad de Medellín, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Environmental Sciences, Carrera 84 # 30-65, CO 050026 Medellín, Colombia
*Correspondence: magonzalez@udemedellin.edu.co

Abstract:

Biogas production as a renewable energy source is gaining more attention from different actors in the energy sector due to the use of different residual products for its generation. This interest also comes from the agricultural sector. A typical crop used for biogas production is maize, which poses environmental challenges related to soil erosion and nutrient depletion. Furthermore, land use changes can also reduce biodiversity and attract pests. An increasing number of strategies to diminish these issues rely on combining maize with other leguminous plants, improving the nutritional silage profiles, and potentially enhancing biogas production. Nonetheless, adopting these new approaches remains limited since the farmers hesitate to invest in new technologies without clear and quantifiable improvements. In this regard, in this study, we propose time-series-based models to predict biogas and methane production based on the silage features of crops and the time-series data. In particular, we fitted models based on Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average with eXogenous variables (ARIMAX) to capture the temporal dependencies, aiming to characterize the methane volume and methane concentration accurately. We used a previously validated measurement campaign, which included other anaerobic digestion variables like volatile solids, crude protein, cellulose, and hemicellulose, among others, from crops of maize and mixed maize-legume silages, along with the production of biogas and methane, with a sample period in days. The reactor was a 5 L fermenter operated at 40  °C with manual mixing daily. It used inoculum and silage, with a 21-day delay before measurement. Biogas volume was recorded using a measuring cylinder, and composition was analyzed with a Dräger X-am 8000. We tested our ARIMAX-based models regarding their goodness of fit using the determination coefficient R2 and the Root Mean Square Error (RMSE). In the case of the methane volume, we obtained an R2 of 0.92 and an RMSE of 0.001 liters, and for the case of methane concentration, our models exhibited an R2 of 0.908 and an RMSE of 0.85%. Our promising models help farmers, researchers, and policymakers to accurately characterize and forecast biogas and methane production as promising renewable energy generation technologies.

Key words:

, , , ,



928-939 N. Sjulander, V. Rooni, L. Rocha-Meneses and T. Kikas
Comparison of different chemical-free pretreatment methods for the production of sugars, ethanol and methane from lignocellulosic biomass
Abstract |
Full text PDF (439 KB)

Comparison of different chemical-free pretreatment methods for the production of sugars, ethanol and methane from lignocellulosic biomass

N. Sjulander¹*, V. Rooni¹, L. Rocha-Meneses² and T. Kikas¹*

¹Estonian University of Life Sciences, Institute of Forestry and Engineering, Chair of Biosystems Engineering, EE51014 Tartu, Estonia
²Renewable and Sustainable Energy Research Center, Technology Innovation Institute, P.O.Box: 9639, Masdar City, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates
*Correspondence: nikki.sjulander@emu.ee; timo.kikas@emu.ee

Abstract:

Most pretreatment methods for lignocellulosic biomass use strong chemicals, such as sulphuric acid and ammonia, to open up the cellular structure of plant biomass. However, those chemicals are not environmentally friendly and their use leads to safety risks. As a result, different chemical-free pretreatment methods have been developed, which focus on the usage of pressure, high or low temperatures and mild chemicals. Freezing pretreatment and explosive decompression pretreatments, using different operating gases, such as nitrogen and steam, are compared in the context of glucose, ethanol and methane yield in this review. For the methane production, the stillage from bioethanol production is used. The usage of this waste improves the overall valorisation of lignocellulosic biomass. The review also investigates, whether the nitrogen explosive decompression pretreatment is suitable for the treatment of softwoods, hardwoods and herbaceous materials. In the comparison of different chemical-free pretreatment methods, it is concluded that heat and water are the most influential parameters for opening up the lignocellulosic biomass structure. The operating gas and pressure in the pretreatment reactor are less relevant. Steam explosion, nitrogen explosive decompression pretreatment and autohydrolysis pretreatment are the most suitable chemical-free pretreatment methods for lignocellulosic biomass.

Key words:

, , , ,



120-134 B. Jankovičová, M. Hutňan, Z. Imreová and R. Zakhar
Increased biogas production from lignocellulosic biomass by soaking in water
Abstract |
Full text PDF (406 KB)

Increased biogas production from lignocellulosic biomass by soaking in water

B. Jankovičová*, M. Hutňan, Z. Imreová and R. Zakhar

Slovak University of Technology in Bratislava, Faculty of Chemical and Food Technology, Department of Environmental Engineering, Radlinského 9, SK812 37 Bratislava 1, Slovakia
*Correspondence: barbora.jankovicova@stuba.sk

Abstract:

Due to its large production worldwide, lignocellulosic biomass represents a substrate with great potential to produce biogas. However, this type of biomass is characterized by a complex and solid structure, which is difficult to decompose by anaerobic microorganisms. Applying the correct pre-treatment method can increase its biodegradability. Lignocellulosic substrate was pre-treated by soaking in water for one day at room temperature to increase biogas production and monitoring of long-term operation of laboratory models of anaerobic reactors for anaerobic digestion of such pre-treated maize waste was employed. Monitoring results in two reactors, R1 with biogas produced from a substrate soaked in water for one day and R0 with the production of biogas from a substrate mixed with water just before dosing into the reactor, were compared showing positive effect of the pre-treatment method. This was expressed by higher values of biogas production and higher methane content in biogas from the substrate soaked in water for one day. The achieved specific biogas productions during four different phases of reactor operation in reactor R1 were in the range of 190–335 mL g-1 of VS (volatile solids)
and 101–221 mL g-1 of VS in reactor R0. Methane content of biogas during reactor operation was 49.3–55.2% in reactor R1 and 42.5–45.5% in reactor R0. During long-term operation of another reactor, pre-treated maize waste was used as a co-substrate for maize silage, in the ratio of 1:1 based on VS of the substrates proving as a suitable co-substrate for maize silage, as the achieved average value of specific biogas production during reactor operation at OLR (organic loading rate) = 1.75 kg VS m-3 d-1 was 510 mL g-1 of VS and during first 67 days at OLR = 2 kg VS m-3 d-1 it was 454 mL g-1 of VS.

Key words:

, , , ,



1339-1350 V.P. Aravani, K. Tsigkou, M. Kornaros and V.G. Papadakis
Laboratory analyses for assessing the potential for biogas production of various agricultural residues in Greece
Abstract |
Full text PDF (262 KB)

Laboratory analyses for assessing the potential for biogas production of various agricultural residues in Greece

V.P. Aravani¹, K. Tsigkou², M. Kornaros²* and V.G. Papadakis¹*

¹Department of Environmental Engineering, University of Patras, 2 Seferi Str., GR30100 Agrinio, Greece
²Department of Chemical Engineering, University of Patras, 1 Karatheodori Str., University Campus- Rio, GR26504 Patras, Greece
*Correspondence: kornaros@chemeng.upatras.gr; vgpapadakis@upatras.gr

Abstract:

Greece produces significant amounts of agricultural and livestock waste. For the needs of this study, Greece was divided into a Northern and a Southern part and relevant proposals were made for residues that can be used for energy production, through anaerobic digestion. For Northern Greece, this study concluded that the most abundant residues and potential substrates for anaerobic digestion valorisation are those of maize, inedible vegetables (including greenhouse vegetables), cattle manure, as well as the residues of beer and wine industry. For Southern Greece, the corresponding substrates are those of maize, inedible vegetables, sheep/goat manure and residues of wine, tomato, orange and olive processing, respectively. Based on the physicochemical characterization of individual feedstocks, corn silage, tomato husks, watermelon, malt, cattle manure, orange, and olive processing residues (olive pomace) were considered as the most suitable feedstocks for anaerobic digestion. Biochemical Methane Potential (BMP) assays for Northern Greece were also performed, testing the most abundant and appropriate residues for anaerobic digestion (of this area), namely corn silage, cattle manure and malt, in order to define their BMP yield as well as their prospective optimum mixtures. It was concluded that the BMP of the mono-substrates is in accordance with literature, while there were no statistically significant differences in the methane yield of all tested mixtures. The residual biomass originating from the three main categories of the agricultural sector (crop residues, agro-industrial residues, and animal manure) in Northern Greece can be efficiently valorised via anaerobic co-digestion, without observing, though, any synergistic effects on methane production.

 

Key words:

, , , , ,



1591–1598 V. Dubrovskis, I. Plume and I. Straume
The production of methane from the straw pellets with addition of enzymes
Abstract |
Full text PDF (307 KB)

The production of methane from the straw pellets with addition of enzymes

V. Dubrovskis*, I. Plume and I. Straume

Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Faculty of Engineering, Institute of Energetics, Cakstes blvd. 5, LV3001, Jelgava, Latvia
*Correspondence: vilisd@inbox.lv

Abstract:

Biogas production requires much cheaper raw materials. The use of straw, as not always the full use of agricultural residues, increases the methane yield in pelletised form compared to non-pelletised straw. Lack is the high ratio of carbon to nitrogen content of straw, which leads to a slow and incomplete breakdown of the matter, and less producing substances from which bacteria produce methane.Variety of additives can be used to improve anaerobic digestion process. This article shows the results of the study, where the enzymes alpha amylase and xylanase and catalysts Metaferm and Melafen mixture are used for the digestion process echancement. Investigation was provided in 16 bioreactors operated in batch mode at 38 °C. Additives were filled into 14 bioreactors and only inoculum were filled into two bioreactors for control. The yield of biogas from straw pellets without additives was 0.655 L g-1DOM and methane 0.301 L g-1DOM after 34 days of anaerobic digestion. The yield of biogas from straw pellets with added alpha amylase was 0.652 L g-1DOM and methane 0.318 L g-1DOM. The yield of biogas from straw pellets with added xylanase was 0.689 L g-1DOM and methane 0.347 L g-1DOM. The yield of biogas from straw pellets with added Metaferm and Melafen mixture was 0.638 L g-1DOM and methane 0.254 L g-1DOM. The study demonstrates that the adding of enzymes increases the production of methane.

Key words:

, , , ,



1881–1890 V. Dubrovskis, I. Plume and I. Straume
Use of ethanol production and stillage processing residues for biogas production
Abstract |
Full text PDF (456 KB)

Use of ethanol production and stillage processing residues for biogas production

V. Dubrovskis*, I. Plume and I. Straume

Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Liela street 2, LV 3001 Jelgava, Latvia
*Correspondence: vilisd@inbox.lv

Abstract:

In Latvia, ethanol is produced mainly from wheat grains. The production process involves the formation of the by-products of wheat bran, grains residues and stillage. By-products from production of alcohol distilling dregs (stillage) contain much organic matter therefore could be useful for the production of the biogas The product with high protein content usable for feed can be produced from the stillage too. A liquid residue is formed during the production process. Purpose of study is the assessment of the methane volume obtainable from the stillage processing residue mixed with wheat brans and grains residues in anaerobic fermentation process and from wheat brans and grains residues mixed only with inoculum. Investigation was provided in 16 bioreactors operated in batch mode at 38 °C. Stillage processing residues mixed with the wheat brans and inoculum were filled into 4 bioreactors, mixed with grains residues were filled into 4 bioreactors and only inoculum was filled into two bioreactors for control. Wheat brans with inoculum were filled into 3 bioreactors. Into others 3 bioreactors were filled grains residues with inoculum. The yield of biogas from wheat brans was 1.151 L g-1DOM and methane 0.593 L g-1DOM after 30 days of anaerobic digestion. The yield of biogas from wheat brans with stillage processing residue was 1.098 L g-1DOM and methane 0.600 L g-1DOM. The yield of biogas from grains residues was 0.915 L g-1DOM and methane 0.451 L g-1DOM. The yield of biogas from grains residues with stillage processing residue was 1.01 L g-1DOM and methane 0.523 L g-1DOM. The study demonstrates that the investigated products are very good raw material for the production of methane. Stillage processing residue acted as a catalyst for the process.

Key words:

, , , , ,



1642-1648 V. Dubrovskis, I. Plume and I. Straume
Suitability of Common nettle (Urticadioica) and Canadian goldenrod (Solidagocanadensis) for methane production
Abstract |
Full text PDF (626 KB)

Suitability of Common nettle (Urticadioica) and Canadian goldenrod (Solidagocanadensis) for methane production

V. Dubrovskis*, I. Plume and I. Straume

Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Faculty of Engineering, Institute of Energetics, Cakstesblvd. 5, LV3001 Jelgava, Latvia
*Correspondence: vilisd@inbox.lv

Abstract:

Support for biogas production in Latvia was decreased. There is an urgent need to investigate the suitability of various inexpensive renewable biomass resources for energy production. Also, itis necessary to explore the possibilities to improve the anaerobic fermentation process with the help of various catalysts. Biocatalyst Metaferm produced in Latvia was used in previous studies with other biomass and showed increase in biogas and methane production. The article shows the results of studies on biogas (methane) production from chopped fresh Common nettle (Urtica dioica) and Canadian goldenrod (Solidago canadensis) biomass and effect of catalyst Metaferm in anaerobic fermentation process. The anaerobic digestion process was performed in 0.75 L laboratory digesters, operated in batch mode (38 ± 1.0 °C, 35 days). The average specific biogas or methane production per unit of dry organic matter added (DOM) from Common nettle was 0.709 L g-1DOM or was 0.324 L g-1DOM respectively. Average specific biogas or methane volume produced from chopped Canadian goldenrod in anaerobic fermentation was 0.548 L g-1DOM or 0.267 L g-1DOM respectively. Average biogas or methane yield from digestion of chopped Common nettle with 1 mL Metaferm was 0.752 L g-1DOM or 0.328 L g-1DOM respectively. Average specific biogas or methane yield from anaerobic fermentation of chopped Canadian goldenrod with 1 mL Metaferm was 0.624 L g-1DOM or 0.276 L g-1DOM respectively. Adding of catalyst Metaferm increases methane yield from chopped nettle or Canadian goldenrod by 1.2% or 3.4% respectively. All investigated biomass resources can be used for methane production.

Key words:

, , , ,



769-783 K. Krištof and J. Gaduš
Effect of alternative sources of input substrates on biogas production and its quality from anaerobic digestion by using wet fermentation
Abstract |
Full text PDF (837 KB)

Effect of alternative sources of input substrates on biogas production and its quality from anaerobic digestion by using wet fermentation

K. Krištof¹* and J. Gaduš²

¹Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Faculty of Engineering, Department of Machines and Production Biosystems, Tr.A. Hlinku 2, SK949 76 Nitra, Slovakia
²Slovak University of Agriculture in Nitra, Faculty of European Studies and Regional Development, Department of Regional Bioenergy, Tr.A. Hlinku 2, SK949 76 Nitra, Slovakia
*Correspondence: koloman.kristof@uniag.sk

Abstract:

The aim of the study was to confirm the suitability of alternative input substrates for production of biogas in order to decrease the need of utilization of high quality maize silage. All of the experiments were conducted by employment of wet fermentation process in mesophilic conditions (temperature in fermentor 40 ± 1 °C) in experimental fermentor with volume 5 m3. The experiments were realised in operating conditions of biogas station designed for utilization of agricultural biowaste. The experiments were divided into two alternatives (I and II cycle) and one control input substrates. In the first alternative (I cycle) was daily dosage formed by 33 kg of Amaranth and 250 L of control manure mixture. In this cycle, more than 3–times greater specific production of biogas was observed with average methane content 63.9% in comparison with control manure mixture (80 : 20%, liquid manure and manure). In the second alternative (II cycle) was daily dosage formed by 19.5 kg of sugar beer cuts, 3.3 kg of maize silage, 1.9 kg of oil-seed rape moldings, 2.5 kg of glycerin and 250 L of control manure mixture. In this cycle, more than 5.9–times greater specific production of biogas was observed. The decrease in average methane content 55.1% however also decrease in average content of hydrogen sulfide (128 ppm) was observed as well. An unquestionable advantage for both tested alternative mixed substrates was increase in biogas production and its quality in comparison with control substrate based on manure. At the basis of these findings can be concluded that both tested alternative input substrate mixtures are suitable as co–fermentation substances with great potential to increase the biogas production and its quality in case of wet fermentation processes.

Key words:

, , , ,



688-695 V. Dubrovskis, I. Plume and I. Straume
Anaerobic co-fermentation of molasses and oil with straw pellets
Abstract |
Full text PDF (602 KB)

Anaerobic co-fermentation of molasses and oil with straw pellets

V. Dubrovskis*, I. Plume and I. Straume

Latvia University of Life Sciences and Technologies, Faculty of Engineering, Institute of Energetics, Cakstes blvd. 5, LV3001 Jelgava, Latvia
*Correspondence: vilisd@inbox.lv

Abstract:

The average grain and straw production in Latvia is increasing in last decade. Straw is not always managed properly and its utilisation in biogas plants can be considered as an alternative. Straw is not the best feedstock for methane production, because it has high C/N ratio. Co-fermentation with other biomass with higher N content can improve the methane production. Purpose of investigation is to evaluate the wheat straw pellets biomass suitability for production of the methane and effect of its co-fermentation with molasses, fried sunflower oil and catalyst Metaferm. The anaerobic digestion process for biogas production was investigated in 0.75 L digesters, operated in batch mode at temperature 38 ± 1.0°C. The average biogas yield per unit of dry organic matter added from digestion of wheat straw pellets was 0.540 L g-1DOM and methane yield was 0.285 L g-1DOM. Average biogas yield from co-fermentation of wheat straw pellets and molasses was 0.777 L g-1DOM and methane yield was 0.408 L g-1DOM. Average biogas yield from fermentation of wheat straw pellets with 1ml Metaferm was 0.692 L g-1DOM and methane yield was 0.349 L g-1DOM. Average biogas yield from co-fermentation of wheat straw pellets and sunflowers oil was 1.041 L g-1DOM and methane yield was 0.639 L g-1DOM. All investigated biomasses can be used for methane production.

Key words:

, , , , ,