Tag Archives: combine harvesters

301–333 P. Borkar , C. Sakhale, R. Tupkar and S. Shelare
Mechanisation and automation trends in modern threshing systems: from stand-alone machines to intelligent combine harvesting technologies
Abstract |
Full text PDF (923 KB)

Mechanisation and automation trends in modern threshing systems: from stand-alone machines to intelligent combine harvesting technologies

P. Borkar¹ , C. Sakhale², R. Tupkar¹ and S. Shelare¹³*

¹ Department of Mechanical Engineering, Priyadarshini College of Engineering,
Nagpur- 440019, Maharashtra, India
²Department of Aeronautical Engineering, Priyadarshini College of Engineering, Nagpur- 440019, Maharashtra, India
³Centre for Research Impact and Outcome, Chitkara University Institute of Engineering and Technology, Chitkara University, Rajpura, 140401, Punjab, India
*Correspondence: sagmech24@gmail.com

Abstract:

The mechanical harvesting process commonly known as threshing effects the grain quality, yield recovery, and agricultural profitability. To meet rising global food demands due to population growth along with labour shortages there is a need for efficient and automated threshing systems capable of producing high yields with low loss. This paper will provide a summary of recent advancements in threshing technology and evaluate its overall performance based upon criteria such as: efficiency; ability to accommodate different crops; and level of technology utilised in its design. The classification system used to classify threshing equipment into categories included those related to type of threshing mechanism (drum type, concave type, axial flow type); source of power (electricity, gasoline, diesel, hydraulic fluid, etc.), and type of equipment (single crop, multiple crops, and combine). Previous experimental studies reported that modern threshing systems can achieve high threshing and cleaning efficiencies depending on crop type, machine configuration, and operating parameters. High-capacity axial-flow systems have demonstrated productivity values up to 543 kg h⁻¹ in reported studies, whereas smaller solar- and pedal-operated threshers provide suitable alternatives for smallholder farming systems where affordability and portability are important considerations.

Key words:

, , , ,



745–750 P. Kic
Influence of air-conditioning on dust level in drivers’ cabin during the harvest of grain
Abstract |
Full text PDF (336 KB)

Influence of air-conditioning on dust level in drivers’ cabin during the harvest of grain

P. Kic

Czech University of Life Sciences Prague, Faculty of Engineering, Department of
Technological Equipment of Buildings, Kamýcká 129, CZ165 21 Prague, Czech Republic
Correspondence: kic@tf.czu.cz

Abstract:

The period of grain harvest is characterized by dry and hot summer weather. During the grain harvest is generated large amount of dust which significantly influences surroundings, but mainly drivers are exposed to dust pollution. The aim of this paper is to present results of microclimatic research focused on dust pollution in drivers’ cabin of tractors and combine harvesters of different construction used for harvest of grain. The machinery selected for this research includes the old but also very modern tractors and combine harvesters which are equipped with air conditioning. In the frame of this research the concentration of air dust was measured by exact instrument DustTRAK II Model 8530 aerosol monitor. Using the special impactors the PM1, PM2.5, PM4, PM10 size fractions were also measured. Obtained results of measurements were evaluated and concentrations of different size of dust particles were analysed. Results of different indoor conditions measured in new and old machinery are generalized.

Key words:

, , , ,



115-123 Z. Kviz, F. Kumhala and J. Masek
Plant remains distribution quality of different combine harvesters in connection with conservation tillage technologies
Abstract |
Full text PDF (227 KB)

Plant remains distribution quality of different combine harvesters in connection with conservation tillage technologies

Z. Kviz*, F. Kumhala and J. Masek

Czech University of Life Sciences in Prague, Faculty of Engennering, Department of Agricultural Machines, Kamycka 129, Prague 6 – Suchdol, 165 21, Prague, Czech Republic; *Correspondence: kviz@tf.czu.cz

Abstract:

Conservation tillage technologies are nowadays a part of modern agriculture. These technologies are used in plant production all around the world. Typical feature for these shallow soil tillage technologies is that all plant residues are left on the soil surface or in the treated (tilled) upper soil layer. The plant residues can significantly influence the next plant germination and growth, especially when they are unevenly placed on the field surface. Today’s modern combine harvesters are able to crush and distribute all plant remains quite evenly with satisfactory results but all their mechanisms have to be properly set and sometimes some small improvements have to be done. This paper describes and evaluates the husk and straw distribution quality – the distribution pattern, on two very commonly used combine harvesters – CASE IH and JOHN DEERE. The measurement was carried out on serially manufactured machines without any change on them and with a small improvement on distribution mechanisms. The measurement of husk and straw distribution pattern was carried out on CASE IH combine harvester with an axial threshing system and on John Deere with a conventional tangential threshing system. Thereby it was possible to compare two completely different systems of threshing process and to observe a possible influence on straw and husk distribution quality (distribution pattern). The most important outcome of the measurement of straw and husk distributors’ work quality on combine harvesters is that cross irregularity of husk and straw distribution depends on instantaneous material feedrate through the harvester.

Key words:

, , , ,